diff --git a/public/writings/when-new-is-not-better.html b/public/writings/when-new-is-not-better.html
index 47f108a..0c0b639 100644
--- a/public/writings/when-new-is-not-better.html
+++ b/public/writings/when-new-is-not-better.html
@@ -83,9 +83,9 @@
             <p>
                 So, why was I in awe with this Minolta? Well, I knew you could take pictures without power, but I didn't
                 know you could have a camera as sophisticated as the SRT-101 work fine without power. Except for the
-                lack of automatic speed selection, it had every single feature my father's Pentax P30n. It felt like as
-                if I had some piece of alien technology between my fingers, which I had stolen from a time and place
-                where things we couldn't even imagine were possible.
+                lack of automatic speed selection and detection of the film roll's ISO sensitivity, it had every single
+                feature my father's Pentax P30n. It felt like as if I had some piece of alien technology between my
+                fingers, which I had stolen from a time and place where things we couldn't even imagine were possible.
             </p>
             <p>
                 The discussion with Sara turned then swerved towards the Minolta. Sara told me about how the SRT-101 was
@@ -96,7 +96,31 @@
             <p>
                 I was instantly sold on the Minolta, which has become my workhorse ever since.
             </p>
-
+            <h3>
+                When new is not better
+            </h3>
+            <p>
+                Now that I've delivered my long rant on how I fell in love with my Minolta and it's simplicity,
+                I want to jump into the lesson that I learned from this whole story. Well, actually, I don't think
+                I've strictly learned it from the Minolta only, but from many other similar situations when dealing
+                with human engineered things. The Minolta is probably just an incredible example.
+            </p>
+            <p>
+                The lesson is simply that new technology and features are not always better. Just like there is no
+                silver bullet for complexity, there is no silver bullet for adding fancy stuff into a camera without
+                sacrificing something. And I want to argue that not all of the combinations in the feature
+                richness/complexity spectrum make sense.
+            </p>
+            <p>
+                Let me focus on the example of my two cameras. Again, the features that the Pentax provides and the
+                Minolta doesn't are (1) detecting automatically the sensitivity of the film roll and (2) having an AUTO
+                mode for the shutter speed, which adjusts itself to the aperture and film sentivity to get the right
+                amount of light.
+            </p>
+            <p>
+                The Minolta doesn't detect the film itself. Instead, this is solved by... you setting it. This is done
+                in a second by simply adjusting it on the same wheel where you select the shutter speed.
+            </p>
 
             <hr>
             <p><a href="../index.html">back to home</a></p>