This PR will compute the listing metrics in an aggregated manner to be displayed in the Main KPIs dashboard, specifically: - New Listings - First Time Booked Listings - Churning Listings - It also adapts the computation for the already existing metrics of Listings Booked in X months At code level, it contains the following: - Adds `int_core__mtd_accommodation_metrics`, which computes the aggregation of the lifecycle of listings at date level (unique), being date the corresponding date from `int_dates_mtd` - Changes `int_core__mtd_aggregated_metrics` to take the accommodation metrics from the new model. Those 3 already existing (Listings booked in X month) now read from the new model as well. - Changes `int_core__mtd_booking_metrics` to remove unused computation, making it lighter. Specifically, it removes 1) listing related metrics, since now we have a dedicated model and 2) number of guests booked, since it's not used at all. The resulting values in local are consistent with what is already reported in the staging report. Related work items: #17312
713 lines
27 KiB
YAML
713 lines
27 KiB
YAML
version: 2
|
|
|
|
models:
|
|
- name: int_core__duplicate_bookings
|
|
description: |
|
|
A list of bookings which are considered duplicates of other bookings.
|
|
|
|
We currently consider two bookings to be duplicate if they have the same:
|
|
- Guest user id
|
|
- Accomodation id
|
|
- Check-in date
|
|
|
|
Bear in mind these bookings do have different booking ids.
|
|
|
|
Out of a duplicated tuple of 2 or more bookings:
|
|
- Our logic will consider the oldest one to be the "original", not duplicate one.
|
|
- This table will contain only the duplicates, and not the original.
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_booking
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: The unique, Superhog generated id for this booking.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_duplicate_booking
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
True if the booking is duplicate.
|
|
|
|
If you are thinking that this is redundant, you are right. All
|
|
records in this table will be true. But we keep this field to
|
|
make your life easier when joining with other tables.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_duplicating_booking_with_id
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: |
|
|
|
|
Indicates what's the original booking being duplicated.
|
|
|
|
If there is a tuple of duplicate bookings {A, B, C}, where A is the
|
|
original and the others are the duplicates:
|
|
- B and C will appear in this table, A will not.
|
|
- The value of this field for both B and C will be A's id.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__booking_charge_events
|
|
description: |
|
|
|
|
Booking charge events is a fancy word for saying: a booking happened,
|
|
the related host had a booking fee set up at the right time, hence we
|
|
need to charge him.
|
|
|
|
The table contains one record per booking and shows the associated
|
|
booking fee, as well as the point in time in which the charge event was
|
|
considered.
|
|
|
|
Be wary of the booking fees: they don't have an associated currency.
|
|
Crazy, I know, but we currently don't store that information in the
|
|
backend.
|
|
|
|
As for the charge dates: the exact point in time at which we consider
|
|
that we should be charging a fee depends on billing details of the host
|
|
customer. For some bookings, this will be the check-in. For others, its
|
|
when the guest begins the verification process.
|
|
|
|
Not all bookings appear here since we don't charge a fee for all
|
|
bookings.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_booking
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: The unique, Superhog generated id for this booking.
|
|
|
|
- name: id_price_plan
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: The id of the price plan that relates to this booking.
|
|
|
|
- name: booking_fee_local
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: The fee to apply to the booking, in host currency.
|
|
|
|
- name: booking_fee_charge_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
description: |
|
|
The point in time in which the booking should be invoiced.
|
|
|
|
This could be the check-in date of the booking or the date in which the guest verification
|
|
started, depending on the billing settings of the host.
|
|
|
|
- name: booking_fee_charge_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
The date in which the booking should be invoiced.
|
|
|
|
This could be the check-in date of the booking or the date in which the guest verification
|
|
started, depending on the billing settings of the host.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__check_in_cover_prices
|
|
description: |
|
|
|
|
This table shows the active price and cover for the Check-In Hero
|
|
product.
|
|
|
|
The prices are obtained through a gross `GROUP BY` thrown at the payment
|
|
validation sets table. It works this way because the price settings of
|
|
this product were done with a terrible backend data model design.
|
|
|
|
How could the prices be changed remains a mystery, and the current design
|
|
does not support any kind of history tracking. When the time comes to
|
|
adjust prices, we will have a lot of careful work to do to make sure that
|
|
we keep history and that no downstream dependencies of this model blow
|
|
up.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: local_currency_iso_4217
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: A currency code.
|
|
|
|
- name: checkin_cover_guest_fee_local_curr
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: |
|
|
The fee that the guest user must pay if he wants to purchase the
|
|
cover.
|
|
|
|
- name: checkin_cover_cover_amount_local_curr
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: |
|
|
The amount for which the guest user is covered if he faces problems
|
|
during check-in.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__unified_user
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_user
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: The unique ID for the user.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__vr_check_in_cover
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_verification_request
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: The unique ID for the verification request.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__mtd_booking_metrics
|
|
description: |
|
|
This model contains the historic information regarding the bookings in an aggregated manner.
|
|
It's used for the business KPIs. Data is aggregated at the last day of the month and in the
|
|
days necessary for the Month-to-Date computation of the current month.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: date
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: The date for the month-to-date booking-related metrics.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__mtd_accommodation_metrics
|
|
description: |
|
|
This model contains the historic information regarding the accommodations in an aggregated manner.
|
|
It's used for the business KPIs. Data is aggregated at the last day of the month and in the
|
|
days necessary for the Month-to-Date computation of the current month.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: date
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: The date for the month-to-date accommodation-related metrics.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__mtd_aggregated_metrics
|
|
description: |
|
|
The `int_core__mtd_aggregated_metrics` model aggregates multiple metrics on a year, month, and day basis.
|
|
The primary sources of data are the `int_core__mtd_XXXXX_metrics` models, which contain the raw metrics data per source.
|
|
This model uses Jinja templating to dynamically generate SQL code, combining various metrics into a single table.
|
|
This approach reduces repetition and enhances maintainability.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- dbt_utils.unique_combination_of_columns:
|
|
combination_of_columns:
|
|
- date
|
|
- metric
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: year
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: year number of the given date.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: month
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: month number of the given date.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: day
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: day monthly number of the given date.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: is_end_of_month
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: is end of month, 1 for yes, 0 for no.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: is_current_month
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
checks if the date is within the current executed month,
|
|
1 for yes, 0 for no.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: date
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
main date for the computation, that is used for filters.
|
|
It comes from int_dates_mtd logic.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: previous_year_date
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
corresponds to the date of the previous year, with respect to the field date.
|
|
It comes from int_dates_mtd logic. It's only displayed for information purposes,
|
|
should not be needed for reporting.
|
|
|
|
- name: metric
|
|
data_type: text
|
|
description: name of the business metric.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: order_by
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
description: |
|
|
order for displaying purposes. Null values are accepted, but keep
|
|
in mind that then there's no default controlled display order.
|
|
|
|
- name: number_format
|
|
data_type: text
|
|
description: allows for grouping and formatting for displaying purposes.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- accepted_values:
|
|
values: ['integer', 'percentage']
|
|
|
|
- name: value
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: |
|
|
numeric value (integer or decimal) that corresponds to the MTD computation of the metric
|
|
at a given date.
|
|
|
|
- name: previous_year_value
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: |
|
|
numeric value (integer or decimal) that corresponds to the MTD computation of the metric
|
|
on the previous year at a given date.
|
|
|
|
- name: relative_increment
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
description: |
|
|
numeric value that corresponds to the relative increment between value and previous year value,
|
|
following the computation: value / previous_year_value - 1.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__verification_request_completeness
|
|
description: |
|
|
The `int_core__verification_request_completeness` model allows to determine if a verification request is
|
|
completed or not. To achieve it, it encapsulates the logic to determine the different possibilites. Its main
|
|
output is the column is_verification_request_complete, but it also provides outputs of the intermediate logic
|
|
steps to be used for further modeling, such as determining the completion date.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_verification_request
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: id of the verification request. It's the unique key for this model.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: expected_verification_count
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: count of verifications that are expected to be passed in order to complete the request.
|
|
|
|
- name: confirmed_from_same_verification_request_count
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: count of confirmed verifications that its logic is computed from the same verification request.
|
|
|
|
- name: confirmed_from_previous_verification_requests_count
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: count of confirmed verifications that its logic is computed from previous verification requests.
|
|
|
|
- name: confirmed_verification_count
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: |
|
|
total count of confirmed verifications. Mainly, it's the sum of the confirmed verifications
|
|
that come from the same verification request plus the ones that come from previous verifications requests.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_verification_request_complete
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: if the verification request can be considered as completed or not.
|
|
|
|
- name: used_verification_from_same_verification_request
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
if the verification request can be considered as completed and has at least one confirmed verification
|
|
from the same verification request.
|
|
|
|
- name: used_verification_from_previous_verification_requests
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
if the verification request can be considered as completed and has at least one confirmed verification
|
|
from a previous verification request.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_complete_only_from_previous_verification_requests
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
if the verification request can be considered as completed and all confirmed verifications are from
|
|
previous verification requests.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__verification_request_completed_date
|
|
description: |
|
|
The `int_core__verification_request_completed_date` model allows to retrieve the time in which the guest
|
|
journey, or verification request, was completed. It only considers that a guest journey is completed based
|
|
on the positive outcome of the is_verification_complete boolean coming from verification_request_completeness
|
|
model.
|
|
|
|
The completion time is computed as follows:
|
|
- Only considering verification requests that have been tagged as completed. From here, we have:
|
|
- If the verification request has, at least, one verification linked; the date will be the creation date
|
|
of the last verification created linked to that verification request.
|
|
To keep in mind: for some cases, the last verification can have updates after the creation, but these
|
|
generally happen with very low time differences with respect to the creation date. However, there are
|
|
some outliers - mostly linked to admin override - that we're not considering here, since these might
|
|
not necessarily be linked to the Guest completing the Guest Journey.
|
|
- If the verification request does not have any verification linked; we assume an automatic completion.
|
|
In this case, we use the time from which the verification request was created.
|
|
|
|
For some cases, it is possible that this logic still generates some completed times that are actually
|
|
before a user usage of the link. For these cases, we do an override and we apply the used_link_at_utc
|
|
as the completed time. To account for this cases, check the boolean column
|
|
is_completed_at_overriden_with_used_link_at.
|
|
|
|
In summary, the guest journey completion time provided here is an estimation.
|
|
|
|
Finally, this model only contains those request that have been completed, so keep it in mind when joining this
|
|
table.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_verification_request
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: id of the completed verification request. It's the unique key for this model.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: estimated_completed_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp
|
|
description: estimated timestamp of when the verification request was completed.
|
|
|
|
- name: estimated_completed_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: estimated date from the timestamp of when the verification request was completed.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_completed_at_overriden_with_used_link_at
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: >
|
|
boolean indicating if the estimated dates have been overriden with the
|
|
used link since the initial computation was still considering an end
|
|
date before a starting date.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__verification_payments
|
|
description: >-
|
|
A simplified table that holds guest journey payments with details around
|
|
when they happen, what service was being paid, what was the related
|
|
verification request, etc.
|
|
|
|
Currency rates are converted to GBP with our simple exchange rates view.
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_verification_to_payment
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: Unique ID for the relation between the payment verification
|
|
and the payment at hand.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- unique
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: id_payment
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: Unique ID for the payment itself.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- unique
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: is_refundable
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
- name: created_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
- name: updated_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
- name: payment_due_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: payment_due_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: payment_paid_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
- name: payment_paid_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
- name: payment_reference
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
- name: refund_due_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
- name: refund_due_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
- name: payment_refunded_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp without time zone
|
|
- name: payment_refunded_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
- name: refund_payment_reference
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
- name: id_guest_user
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
- name: id_verification
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
- name: id_verification_request
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
- name: verification_payment_type
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
- name: amount_in_txn_currency
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: currency
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: amount_in_gbp
|
|
data_type: numeric
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- name: payment_status
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
- name: notes
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__country
|
|
description: |
|
|
This model contains information regarding countries, such as codes,
|
|
names and preferred currencies
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_country
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: id of the country. It's the unique key for this model.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: iso_2
|
|
data_type: char(2)
|
|
description: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code. Cannot be null.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: iso_3
|
|
data_type: char(3)
|
|
description: |
|
|
ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 country code. Some countries can have this value as not set,
|
|
therefore it's nullable.
|
|
|
|
- name: country_name
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: name of the country. Cannot be null.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: iso_num_code
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: |
|
|
ISO 3166-1 numeric code. Usually it's 3 digits, but since it's categorised as
|
|
an integer, the preceding zeros are removed. Nullable.
|
|
|
|
- name: phone_code
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: |
|
|
Phone code prefix for a given country. Can contain default / duplicated values.
|
|
|
|
- name: id_preferred_currency
|
|
data_type: int
|
|
description: |
|
|
Id of the preferred currency for a given country. Might not be the only currency
|
|
used in the country, it's just the preferred one.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: preferred_currency_name
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: |
|
|
Currency name of the preferred currency for a given country.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: preferred_iso4217_code
|
|
data_type: char(3)
|
|
description: |
|
|
Three-letter code assigned to the preferred currency for a given country by the ISO.
|
|
These codes are part of the ISO 4217 standard.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__accommodation
|
|
description: |
|
|
This model contains information regarding accommodations, also known as listings.
|
|
It contains information regarding the host this accommodation is linked to,
|
|
the geographic details, the preferred currency according to the country, details about
|
|
the listing itself (floors, bedrooms, etc) and time-related information of when the
|
|
listing was created.
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: id_accommodation
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: Id of the accommodation or listing. It's the unique key for this model.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
- unique
|
|
|
|
- name: id_user_host
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: The unique ID for the host. Can be null.
|
|
|
|
- name: id_payment_validation_set
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: Id of the payment validation set linked to a listing. Can be null.
|
|
|
|
- name: friendly_name
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: country_iso_2
|
|
data_type: char(2)
|
|
description: ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code where the listing is located.
|
|
|
|
- name: country_name
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: Name of the country where the listing is located.
|
|
|
|
- name: country_preferred_currency_code
|
|
data_type: char(3)
|
|
description: |
|
|
Three-letter code assigned to the preferred currency for a given country by the ISO.
|
|
These codes are part of the ISO 4217 standard. Keep in mind this are preferred, not
|
|
necessarily the actual currency.
|
|
|
|
- name: is_active
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: |
|
|
Boolean to indicate if the listing is active or not. If false, this is considered as a
|
|
hard deactivation - meaning no more bookings can be assigned to this listing. However,
|
|
even if a listing is active, that does not necessarily mean that it's receiving bookings.
|
|
Do not confuse this column with the lifecycle activity of a listing that is computed in
|
|
int_core__mtd_accommodation_lifecycle.
|
|
|
|
- name: town
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: postcode
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: address_line_1
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: address_line_2
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: verification_level
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: floor_area
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: number_of_floors
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: number_of_bedrooms
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: number_of_bathrooms
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: number_of_other_rooms
|
|
data_type: integer
|
|
|
|
- name: construction_details
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
|
|
- name: created_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp
|
|
description: Timestamp of when the listing was created. Cannot be null.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: created_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: Date of when the listing was created
|
|
|
|
- name: updated_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp
|
|
description: Timestamp of when the listing was last updated according to the backend.
|
|
|
|
- name: updated_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: Date of when the listing was last updated according to the backend.
|
|
|
|
- name: dwh_extracted_at_utc
|
|
data_type: timestamp
|
|
description: Timestamp of when the accommodation record was extracted from the backend into the DWH.
|
|
|
|
- name: int_core__mtd_accommodation_lifecycle
|
|
description: |
|
|
This model contains the historic information regarding the lifecycle of accommodations, also known as
|
|
listings. The information regarding the booking-related time allows for the current status of any listing
|
|
regarding its activity. This information is encapsulated in the following columns:
|
|
|
|
accommodation_lifecycle_state: contains one of the following states
|
|
- 01-New: Listings that have been created in the current month, without bookings
|
|
- 02-Never Booked: Listings that have been created before the current month, without bookings.
|
|
- 03-First Time Booked: Listings that have been booked for the first time in the current month.
|
|
- 04-Active: Listings that have booking activity in the past 12 months (that are not FTB nor reactivated)
|
|
- 05-Churning: Listings that are becoming inactive because of lack of bookings in the past 12 months
|
|
- 06-Inactive: Listings that have not had a booking for more than 12 months.
|
|
- 07-Reactivated: Listings that have had a booking in the current month that were inactive or churning before.
|
|
- Finally, if none of the logic applies, which should not happen, null will be set and a dbt alert will raise.
|
|
|
|
Since the states of Active, First Time Booked and Reactivated indicate certain booking activity and are
|
|
mutually exclusive, the model also provides information of the recency of the bookings by the following
|
|
booleans:
|
|
- has_been_booked_within_current_month: If a listing has had a booking created in the current month
|
|
- has_been_booked_within_last_6_months: If a listing has had a booking created in the past 6 months
|
|
- has_been_booked_within_last_12_months: If a listing has had a booking created in the past 12 months
|
|
Note that if a listing has had a booking created in a given month, all 3 columns will be true. Similarly,
|
|
if the last booking created to a listing was 5 months ago, only the column has_been_booked_in_1_month
|
|
will be false; while the other 2 will be true.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- dbt_utils.unique_combination_of_columns:
|
|
combination_of_columns:
|
|
- date
|
|
- id_accommodation
|
|
|
|
columns:
|
|
- name: date
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: The date for the month-to-date. Information is inclusive to the date displayed.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: id_accommodation
|
|
data_type: bigint
|
|
description: Id of the accommodation or listing.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: creation_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: Date of when the listing was created.
|
|
|
|
- name: first_time_booked_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
Date of the first booking created for a given listing. Can be null if the listing
|
|
has never had a booking associated with it.
|
|
|
|
- name: last_time_booked_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
Date of the last booking created for a given listing. Can be null if the listing
|
|
has never had a booking associated with it. Can be the same as first_time_booked_date_utc
|
|
if the listing only had 1 booking in its history.
|
|
|
|
- name: second_to_last_time_booked_date_utc
|
|
data_type: date
|
|
description: |
|
|
Date of the second-to-last booking created for a given listing, meaning the creation
|
|
date of the booking that precedes the last one. It's relevant for the reactivation computation
|
|
on the lifecycle. Can be null if the listing has never had a booking associated with it or if
|
|
the listing only had 1 booking in its history.
|
|
|
|
- name: accommodation_lifecycle_state
|
|
data_type: character varying
|
|
description: |
|
|
Contains the lifecycle state of a Listing. The accepted values are:
|
|
01-New, 02-Never Booked, 03-First Time Booked, 04-Active, 05-Churning, 06-Inactive,
|
|
07-Reactivated. Failing to implement the logic will result in alert.
|
|
tests:
|
|
- not_null
|
|
|
|
- name: has_been_booked_within_current_month
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: If the listing has had a booking created in the current month.
|
|
|
|
- name: has_been_booked_within_last_6_months
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: If the listing has had a booking created in the past 6 months.
|
|
|
|
- name: has_been_booked_within_last_12_months
|
|
data_type: boolean
|
|
description: If the listing has had a booking created in the past 12 months.
|
|
|