2022-07-04 11:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
# Ideas for next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Using Kaggle for the competition and making it individual. This would
|
|
|
|
|
definetely make the logistics easier, and the individual part of it would
|
|
|
|
|
probably be much more stimulating. It would also help me better spot who is
|
|
|
|
|
really interested in the course.
|
|
|
|
|
- I am thinking about switching from the 3-part approach to the course (
|
|
|
|
|
Simulation-Optimization-ML) to a two part (Optimization and ML). The contents
|
|
|
|
|
would be roughly the same, but the simulation part would be more geared
|
|
|
|
|
towards the serious metaheuristics and we would spend a bit less time in the
|
|
|
|
|
mathematical programming bit. I just realized that, in my mind, I had
|
|
|
|
|
packaged simulation as something completely different from optimization. But
|
|
|
|
|
that is quite silly. Optimization is optimization, no matter if you are doing
|
|
|
|
|
it through Linear Programming or through metaheuristics. The role of
|
|
|
|
|
simulation is to compute the value of a target function in a heuristic
|
|
|
|
|
environment. That's it. Hence, the simulation case then would not be so
|
|
|
|
|
naive, but rather require students to build a genetic algorithm solution to
|
|
|
|
|
tackle a more complex case of optimization, such as a multiechelon inventory
|
|
|
|
|
optimization situation.
|
|
|
|
|
- I have also changed my mind on the course grading. I really don't like to do
|
|
|
|
|
the exam. The cases have so much more value when compared to the exam. Some
|
|
|
|
|
of the students let me know that they thought that grading was not balanced
|
|
|
|
|
with the exam having so much weight, and I can't help but agree. I will
|
|
|
|
|
probably try to change the weight, but I still need to find a way to prevent
|
|
|
|
|
free-loaders from going through the course unharmed. I have thought that
|
|
|
|
|
maybe I could make the students work in groups of 2. The chance of having
|
|
|
|
|
free-loaders lowers by a lot. And then I could pull the cases grade up to 75%
|
|
|
|
|
and the exam would only by 25%.
|
2022-07-04 12:10:53 +02:00
|
|
|
- For the part that is strictly related to mathematical programming, I would
|
|
|
|
|
like to do something with Gurobi materials. That way I can learn about it,
|
|
|
|
|
students learn about Gurobi and Helena will be happy.
|
2022-07-04 11:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
- For next year, I want to include a few additional ideas in the first welcome
|
|
|
|
|
class:
|
|
|
|
|
- Publish the grades from Avaldo and show them to the new students.
|
2022-09-05 09:19:11 +02:00
|
|
|
- Remind the guys that I am at their service and that feedback at the end
|
|
|
|
|
of the course, although very necessary, won't help improve their
|
|
|
|
|
experience during this year. So, no hard feelings, just let me know
|
|
|
|
|
mid-way through if you believe we could change things for the better.
|
2022-07-04 11:13:11 +02:00
|
|
|
- Give a lessons learnt from last year to students (what did successful
|
|
|
|
|
students do, what did students that failed do)
|
2022-07-04 12:10:53 +02:00
|
|
|
- Show places where students from last year are today (Iker, Ivan, Marc,
|
|
|
|
|
etc)
|
2022-10-06 19:55:43 +02:00
|
|
|
- Perhaps also invite one of them to talk a bit during the first session?
|
|
|
|
|
- Having feedback from the student surveys was great, but I can't do anything
|
|
|
|
|
with that if I receive it once I'm done with course. In order to be able to
|
|
|
|
|
act upon the feedback of the students, I'll show a little QR code at the end
|
|
|
|
|
of each lecture that will link to a form where students can drop feedback,
|
|
|
|
|
anonymously or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|